FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
November 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
Monthly archives
Gibbons: WTF?

Start looking for the Four Horsemen, readers, because it looks like Gov. Jim Gibbons is softening his position on taxes.

Up until now, Gibbons has repeatedly — repeatedly, we tell you — said “no new taxes” every single time anybody has said anything about budgets, like the governor was some kind of retarded parrot on crack. The only exception, he once allowed, are taxes that are approved by a vote of the people, such as the recent room tax advisory question that recently passed in Clark County.

But now? Well, things look different when you’re staring down the business end of a $1.5 billion budget shortfall, one that without new revenue will surely require layoffs and deep program cuts. A couple paragraphs from the Review-Journal’s account of the situation:

“We are going to have to look at some of our revenue (sources) and see if that is an option,” said Gibbons when questioned by reporters whether he would support tax increases. “I don’t want to raise taxes, as everybody knows. It would be a terrible thing in a time of recession.”

But Gibbons, who was elected on a no-tax-increase platform, said he would sign tax increase bills that have the support of the general public or the affected industry.

Do you realize what this could mean, readers? It could mean that the thing we all recognize as “reality” has finally forced its way into that dark, twisted bubble in which Gibbons has lived, at least since being elected to Congress. And that’s got to be a difficult thing for any human being to experience, much less somebody like Gibbons. We dare say we’re happy for the big lug. He may have taken his first steps toward becoming human.

Then again, he’s not giving up much: A tax OK’d by the people or the affected industry is only a short hop from his previous “no new taxes” position, and virtually ensures that those who need to be taxed the most — businesses that currently pay nothing on gross or net income — will escape once again, absent a legislative supermajority willing to override a gubernatorial veto.

And while we have long campaigned for Gibbons to remove the gubernatorial cranium from the gubernatorial sphincter and look at what his hands-off benign neglect was doing to Nevada, we’d be remiss in our pundit duties if we didn’t note that if Gibbons actually signs a tax increase in violation of his oft-repeated pledge, he’s also signing his political death warrant. Then again, we asked him to resign long ago, so, whatever, governor, go ahead and do it! Maybe something good can come out of the end of a bad political career.

Finally, our condolences to Ben Kieckhefer, whom Gibbons dismissed as director of communications on Friday. He was a good person who, for reasons only he knows, took a job with Gibbons that could only have led him to bad ends. Kieckhefer was almost always professional (except for the time he inexplicably refused to tell Gibbons we were working on a story about the governor). He never spoke ill of his boss in our presence. And the reasons for his departure remain a mystery.

The pattern, however, is clear: Loyal employees tossed aside without regard for their service, or loyal employees quitting after being shocked at the dysfunction of the office. We can’t wait to see who takes the job of running interference between Gibbons and the press now.

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.

Comments for this post will be closed on 7 February 2009.

5 Responses to “Gibbons: WTF?”

Hmmmm. So if the 1932 election wasn’t a choice to reject one philosophy in favor of another, which of FDR’s other three elections would you say was a choice to embrace the New Deal? Because America sure did embrace it at some point. (Hunger and joblessness tends to do that to a person.)

Keep going with the hate. Every public expression like this proves our points anew, and shows readers more about why you really dislike Obama.

Written by: Steve Sebelius on Tuesday, Nov. 11, 2008 at 6:09 AM

First of all, the principles of the New Deal weren’t settled during the election of 1932. That election was a rejection of Hoover just like the one a week ago was a symbolic rejection of Bush, not an affirmation of Obongoloid.

Written by: Dignan on Monday, Nov. 10, 2008 at 10:17 PM

OOOOH, YES - MAJOR SLAP DOWN STEVE!

I just love it the way you use dem der big words from being edjumaketed and pronukiating on idgit people’s feelings who don’t even knows how to use a dikesionary and look wurds up (even now and then)!

Seriously, this is why we call Nevada - NevaDUH! Stupid people don’t know how sadly stupid they are - we MUST fix the educational system in Nevada!

When we get to Universal Healthcare - we MUST ensure it includes Mental Health Care also!

Written by: Johnathan Abbinett on Monday, Nov. 10, 2008 at 12:44 PM

Somebody should tell you that writing the exact same thing over and over again — even under different usernames — does not make it any more compelling or persuasive. It just makes it more annoying. Our system of progressive taxation works just fine — the more you earn, the more you pay toward the things that we all need and use everyday.

But we’re pleased as always to see conservatives fighting the battles over taxation (settled with the ratification of the Sixteenth Amendment on Feb. 3, 1913). Or the principles of the New Deal, settled with the election of FDR in November 1932. Keep fighting the battles of the early 20th century, without realizing that history and the country have moved on. In that way, though often annoying, you will continue to serve an important public purpose: A living museum of the kind of opposition thinking that was in vogue in the Wilson administration.

Written by: Steve Sebeius on Monday, Nov. 10, 2008 at 11:15 AM

Why not push for a Tax Me Fund instead of coercing Nevada taxpayers to cough up more money for the gov’t schools which are overflowing with illegals? That way you and anyone else who wants to pay more taxes will know where to send the money. Of course, I’m sure you’ve already written a big fat extra check to the Nevada gov’t, no?

Written by: Hammer of Thor on Sunday, Nov. 9, 2008 at 5:10 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics