FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jul   Sep »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Monthly archives
“Don’t tax you, don’t tax me…”

The Review-Journal published a poll in today’s editions, revealing that 60 percent favor increasing the room tax to pay for education, a move that will raise about $150 million to $185 million per year. “People will vote for tax increases that don’t affect them. I would be surprised if it did not pass given the numbers that are showing right now,” said Brad Coker, managing partner of Maxon-Dixon, the company that did the poll.

Exactly. People don’t mind soaking others for things they ought to be paying for themselves. In this case it’s two easy targets: Casinos, and tourists.

How many of those people would walk into a 7-Eleven, fill up a Big Gulp, grab some Doritos and then tell the clerk to charge the guy who’s next in line? Sure they might want to do that, but how many would actually have the cojones to do it in person?

Not very many. But they’ll do it at the ballot box.

The point is, education benefits everybody in Nevada, and therefore, everybody in Nevada has an obligation to pay. A good chunk of room taxes already go toward education. The casino industry — which pays sales and gambling taxes, the two levies that make up about one-half of the state’s general fund — pay heavily into schools, too. Clark County residents pay for schools via property taxes.

Who doesn’t pay? Well, businesses, for one. Nevada has no corporate income tax, gross receipts tax, net profits tax, or anything that would compel businesses that benefit from education to support it in the one way that really matters, i.e. with dollars.

“The room tax ought to be part of some package to deal with, long term, the state’s needs. This particular proposal isn’t really going to meet those needs,” says Alan Feldman, spokesman for MGM Mirage. And Feldman is absolutely correct: the existing package isn’t going to do jack to help schools, especially under the pain of Gov. Jim Gibbons’s budget knife. (We’d love for MGM Mirage to propose an alternative, by the way, and actually work to enact it. Anybody? Anybody?)

University Chancellor Jim Rogers came to a stark conclusion recently, that Gibbons simply doesn’t care about state services. He only cares about reducing the size and scope of government, because he thinks it’s too big. (Nevada has a “spending problem,” the governor says, not a tax problem.) He’s joined by others, such as Regent Ron Knecht, who recently denigrated the very education system he’s supposed to be guiding.

The problem is, there’s plenty of people in Nevada who simply don’t want to pay, either because of greed, laziness or a warped political philosophy that says public education isn’t worth supporting in the first place. They want their Big Gulp free. And there’s just no such thing.

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
6 Responses to ““Don’t tax you, don’t tax me…””

[...] by taxing people who don’t live in Nevada (tourists) via higher lodging taxes.  Yesterday, Sebelius wrote… “The Review-Journal published a poll in today’s editions, revealing that 60 percent [...]

 
Written by: E!! The True Conservative Story™ » Blog Archive » Tax It Backward on Saturday, Aug. 23, 2008 at 4:09 PM

Warped political philosophy? Oh, you mean people who believe in limited gov’t? If you want your kids to go to school, pay for it yourself! Don’t soak others. BTW, Hans Hoppe (UNLV) long ago smashed the “everyone benefits, so everyone should pay” proganda in his A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism. You have some reading to do!

Written by: Charles Martel on Saturday, Aug. 23, 2008 at 3:52 PM

For dose of us raized in NevaDUH, keep in your minds dat weeze been sent throo sum of the worstest schools in ‘Merika - so tho weeze knows weeze been screwed in getting edjumakated, we have no idea how bad weeze been screwed - but, it’s badd!

Written by: NevaDUHS? on Saturday, Aug. 23, 2008 at 9:07 AM

We need to start boiling the frog and raise the gaming tax 1% each legislative session till it reaches parity with Atlantic City.

One percent, let them bitch about one measly percent.

Written by: VegasTeaRoom on Friday, Aug. 22, 2008 at 9:56 PM

Steve, there is one flaw to your premise - Stupid Nevadans don’t know that education benefits everyone in Nevada - because so many are STOOOOPUD!

For example, did you notice that 9.7%, (or nearly two-thirds of the 15% that actually voted in the Primary) voted to retain Elizabeh Halverson while she was under indictment and her trial was widely covered in the media?

How can this be? Well, it’s because so many STOOOPUD NEVADANS don’t watch any news, don’t listen to news radio, and don’t read any newspapers - I’m amazed if someone actually knows the date, day of the week and time of day here!

Asking for directions, or even which direction is North - is asking too much!

Written by: Stupid Nevadans on Friday, Aug. 22, 2008 at 8:37 PM

As an aside (but still in the vein), waaaaay back in FY 1994 state gaming taxes used to provide 41.3% of the reveune compared to 27.5% today. Back then in FY 1994 combined sales and use tax provided 31.8% of the revenue compared to 33% today. Combined, the gaming and s/u tax provided 73% of revenues in FY94 versus 57% today.

I note that mineral tax revenue has declined 50% since FY 1994 (from 1.7% to less than 1% today) and yet mining revenues are waaaaay up today.

The modified business tax, including the financial sector’s, provide 9.2% of revenues today and the real property tax an additional 3.8%. Hey!, these two combine for 13% which almost makes up the difference in the new lower gaming tax revenue (gaming tax revenue down 13.8% FY 94 v. FY 08).

I guess that’s what they mean when they say Nevada’s tax base is ‘diversified’ today!

You know, some schools in this state get over $21,000 per pupil and yet many of the children in those specific schools are still failing. More money can be useful, but there is more to the issue than “more money”.

Today, Nevada is fairly close to TASC levels of spending as compared to FY 1994, so, I wonder, what the success rate of students in our schools back then; and compared to today?

Written by: dave404 on Friday, Aug. 22, 2008 at 6:54 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics