FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS
View all blog entries
August 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Jul   Sep »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Monthly archives
Too hot for them?

The Clark County Commission this morning postponed for two weeks the hiring of Republican lobbyist Robert Uithoven to advocate for University Medical Center, after concerns were raised about his affiliation with Gov. Jim Gibbons and Las Vegas Sands Corp. Chairman Sheldon Adelson. The case against Uithoven was made most acutely by the Las Vegas Gleaner on Monday.

Yes, the Clark County Commission has a 5-2 Democratic majority. Sure, it could very likely be a 7-0 majority. Sure, Uithoven is a committed Republican, as are the unpopular Adelson and the pathetic Gibbons. And Democrats handing tax dollars from an overwhelmingly Democratic county to a member of the GOP seems unseemly.

But consider this: Lobbying is about relationships. People are hired to make a case with lawmakers with whom they’ve got an open door. And Uithoven has an open door with the governor, who Uithoven is trying to save from the inevitably negative verdict of history.

Plus, it would take a miracle to get Gibbons to support UMC anyway, given his view that government shouldn’t compete with the private sector. Why not give Uithoven a shot?

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.
5 Responses to “Too hot for them?”

Can I ask the obvious question here?

If all they want is the Gibbers’ attention, isn’t there another out-of-work playmate they can hire to memorize a couple pro-UMC talking points that she can recite while he talks her up?

I mean, whose more likely to get through to the scamp, some political hack who screwed over the moron rurals, or some silicon-and-scalpel enhanced bombshell? My vote is for the latter.

Written by: theo on Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2008 at 10:42 PM

Yeah, “relationships” - I’ve noticed that nothing is more important than being a “friend” - Hitler made sure only his “friends” got to be members of the SS and surrounded himself with a tight circle - they all had a special sort of “relationship” didn’t they?

Hey, I’m just saying that’s the way it is TOO!

Written by: Johnathan L. Abbinett on Wednesday, Aug. 20, 2008 at 10:22 PM

It is all about relationships, making sausage and honor amongst whores. The most pragmatic relationship in politics is with cash.

Written by: VegasTeaRoom on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008 at 4:23 PM

If that kid-hating, baseball-loathing lobbyist just happens to be the guy who got the governor elected (and to whom the governor will most certainly listen), then the answer to your question is, “hell, yeah!”

Remember, in lobbying, it’s not about partisanship. It’s about relationships. This is where politics gets “pragmatic,” which is the nice way of saying, “ugly as hell.” We’re not saying we like it; we’re just saying it’s the way it is.

Written by: Steve Sebelius on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008 at 3:16 PM

Uithoven is Beers and Heck campaign manager. So if your belief is government is bad (despite ones own long term of living on a government check-and that that employment still provides one a paycheck), why have someone who is fundametally opposed to government inefficiencies hired as a mouth piece to support your inefficiencies?

Last week I saw the question framed thusly; Guy doesn’t like kids or baseball, would you hire him to lobby on behalf of Little League?

Written by: Ronnie K on Tuesday, Aug. 19, 2008 at 2:51 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics