FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS

Steve Sebelius is editor of CityLife, and a longtime resident of Las Vegas. He’s worked as a reporter for the Las Vegas Sun, a writer for CityLife, and as a political columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. He was born and raised in Southern California, and returns regularly for fun in the sun where it’s not 116 degrees and where the “water feature” is named the “Pacific Ocean.” In addition to politics, he enjoys movies, fine wine, fine cigars, fine restaurants, television and books of all kinds. He blogs most every weekday.

View all blog entries
May 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Monthly archives
Operation: Destroy Nevada! proceeding apace

The backers of a trio of ballot initiatives designed to make it nearly impossible to raise taxes via initiative petition and to slowly begin dismantling the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority have gathered more than enough signatures to file their measures with the secretary of state.

Former Controller Steve Martin submitted 122,921 signatures for the so-called Nevada Taxpayers Protection Act, which would amend the state constitution to require that all ballot initiatives seeking to raise taxes be approved by two-thirds of the voting public. And former Treasurer Bob Seale filed the so-called Education Enhancement Act, which would amend the constitution to divert growth in room tax revenue from local governments and the LVCVA to K-12 education. He also filed the Funding Nevada’s Priorities Act, which would amend the constitution to divert growth in room tax money to education, public safety and roads.

Both initiatives are the brainchildren of Las Vegas Sands Inc. and its chairman, Sheldon Adelson, who hates taxes and the LVCVA.

Currently, the Legislature must muster a two-thirds vote to raise or implement taxes, but taxes proposed on a ballot measure need only a simple majority vote. “Special interest groups are trying to circumvent the Legislature’s two-thirds requirement by placing massive tax increases on the ballot, where today they only need a simple majority vote,” Martin said, in a statement released by the firm of Adelson’s fixer, Republican consultant Sig Rogich.

Translated, of course, that means that underpaid teachers, finally fed up with a feckless Legislature handing out paltry raises, have decided to revolt by increasing taxes on casinos, including Adelson’s. If the Nevada State Education Association is successful in its drive to place a tax increase on the ballot this year and again in 2010, it will need only a simple majority to pass, since the two-thirds requirement won’t go into effect until 2010.

“Voters from all across Nevada have expressed their strong opposition to raising taxes on working families during these difficult economic times,” Seale said in another statement released by Rogich’s team. “My initiatives give voters a choice to effectively utilize existing tax revenues and invest them towards some of our more pressing needs, such as education, public safety and transportation.”

Translated: Voters haven’t really said anything about raising taxes, but this is a good way to make sure the LVCVA is crippled in its efforts to compete with Las Vegas Sands Inc.’s convention center.

Now, signatures must be verified on the petitions. If the petitions have at least 58,628 valid signatures, they will appear on the November ballot. If approved, they will all appear on the November 2010 ballot, too, since constitutional amendments must be approved twice. (And if both Seale’s measures pass, the one with the highest vote total becomes law.)

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.

Comments for this post will be closed on 17 August 2008.

3 Responses to “Operation: Destroy Nevada! proceeding apace”

Will Mr. Martin agree that the Taxpayer Education Act will only take effect if it gets 2/3 support. Or does he want to use the same simple majority to get his way that he complains about?

Written by: StewartWingfield on Tuesday, May. 20, 2008 at 7:57 AM

Steve,

I don’t believe these constitutional initiative issues have yet been fully adjudicated, especially Mr. Martin’s Nevadans for a Fair Tax.

Keep your ear out for arguments up North.

Is there a novel and surprising legal argument afoot…..?

Written by: sniff on Monday, May. 19, 2008 at 5:46 PM

Did Seale sign those petitions?
Wonder what voting address Seale used…hmmmm?

Written by: snif on Monday, May. 19, 2008 at 5:21 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics