FONT SIZE | RSS FEEDS EMAIL THIS PRINT THIS POST A COMMENT EMAIL ALERTS

Steve Sebelius is editor of CityLife, and a longtime resident of Las Vegas. He’s worked as a reporter for the Las Vegas Sun, a writer for CityLife, and as a political columnist for the Las Vegas Review-Journal. He was born and raised in Southern California, and returns regularly for fun in the sun where it’s not 116 degrees and where the “water feature” is named the “Pacific Ocean.” In addition to politics, he enjoys movies, fine wine, fine cigars, fine restaurants, television and books of all kinds. He blogs most every weekday.

View all blog entries
May 2008
Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
« Apr   Jun »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  
Monthly archives
Is Eric Herzik ever right? (Answer: No.)

Gubernatorial defender, and now-sure-to-be-lifetime-tenured UNR professor Eric Herzik was taking up Gov. Jim Gibbons cause once again, this time in a Canadian National Post story helpfully linked by our colleague Hugh Jackson at the Las Vegas Gleaner.

To our neighbors to the north, Herzik said this when asked about state law that requires Gibbons to reside at the seat of government:  “This whole situation’s odd. What’s he going to do, call the state police and have her tossed out? The home that he can live in Reno is 30 miles away from Carson City. Many state employees commute.”

Ah, yes many state employees do commute. But how many of them are subject to the provisions of NRS 223.040, which says they must “…reside at the seat of government”? Um, that would be one. Guess who? The governor! So while Herzik might like state law to say the governor shall reside at the seat of government, “…except in situations classified as ‘odd’ in which event he may live 30 miles away,” it actually doesn’t say that. So, no go, Mr. Professor. (BTW, the NRS is on computers now. Anybody can look it up!)

Now, we’re not saying Gibbons should call the state police and throw his wife of more than two decades, Dawn Gibbons, out on the street. But since the mansion has 23 rooms, according to the National Post piece, perhaps they could share until their sure-to-be-nasty divorce is complete?

Of course, Herzik also says the governor’s divorce case should remain sealed. “There is no public policy interest in whether he was a good husband or she was a bad wife. That has nothing to do with the state budget,” he said.

Pardon us, but we disagree. There could be a great deal in those divorce filings that’s of interest to the public, given the reports of Gibbons being under investigation by the FBI. And while we have maintained consistently that Gibbons (and other politicians) ought to have some zone of privacy with it comes to purely personal matters that have no bearing on their administration, when it comes to the courts, we think the papers should be open, for every public figure.

Oh, and what makes Herzik think that Gibbons was a “good husband” or Dawn Gibbons was a “bad wife”? Oh, that’s right: Herzik is in love with Gibbons.

Post a comment!
Terms & Conditions
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.

Comments for this post will be closed on 7 August 2008.

3 Responses to “Is Eric Herzik ever right? (Answer: No.)”

Nevada’s worst Governor, Jim Gibbons voluntarily left the mansion on his own volition - he is fully responsible for not respecting the law requiring him to reside at the seat of power - it has nothing to do with Dawn Gibbons!

I agree with providing some privacy for politicians, especially regarding their intimate family relationships, such as their children and grand-children…but if the Governor is doing anything that may be illegal it should be open to the sunshine of public scrutiny!

You know like assaulting a waitress, or covering for a buddy that did something innapproprate with a minor daughter, or taking bribes - you know, stuff like that is important - especially from the “family values” Republican Party!

Written by: Johnathan L. Abbinett on Tuesday, May. 13, 2008 at 12:07 AM

Steve,
Your utter (justified) disdain for the Herzik is superceded only by the RGJ Regurgitator’s (BURP) unmitigated adulation for the goobber’s lover boy.

Written by: Sam Dehne on Sunday, May. 11, 2008 at 8:47 PM

I agree with your comments in the last paragraph! But, of course, Dawn must have been a bad wife otherwise Jim Gibbons wouldn’t have been the one to file for divorce. Given the Republicans’ platform on family values and the sanctity of marriage, Erik Herzik is absolutely wrong that the public does not have an interest in this divorce. What an idiot!

Written by: NLV Resident on Friday, May. 9, 2008 at 8:15 PM
CityPics
Community photo sharing
View reader photos and share your own at CityPics