Now, we know Nevada readers get tired of hearing that California is so much better, especially from writers who came from California. If California is so great, why don’t you move back there? people ask. But this isn’t that kind of post. Not really.
Regular readers know that we’ve gone on at length about how we think state law clearly prohibits the Wynn Las Vegas from stealing tips from its dealers and distributing them among supervisors. The fact that the state labor commissioner and a very good District Court judge disagree with us doesn’t change how we feel one bit.
Well, California apparently has a law similar to Nevada’s, only in the Golden State, they actually enforce it. That’s why, after Starbucks tried to pull a Wynn and distribute baristas’s tips to shift supervisors, a San Diego Superior Court judge said no way. And she ordered the company to pay back $100 million that had been uplawfully siphoned from workers.
Starbucks, of course, has vowed to appeal.
Contrast that with Nevada, where a monied player like Steve Wynn is able to get away with stealing dealers’s tips because the law is “interpreted” to mean something other than what it plainly says.
We’re not arguing that California is inherently better than Nevada, even with its beautiful beaches, great skiing, glorious sunsets, wonderful vineyards and always world-leading industry, Hollywood. But we are arguing, in this one narrow case at least, California is way ahead of the Silver State.
This entry was posted
on Saturday, March 22nd, 2008 at 11:12 am and is filed under
Various Things & Stuff.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the
RSS 2.0 feed.
Both comments and pings are currently closed.
The following comments are provided by readers and are the sole responsiblity of the authors. By publishing a comment here you agree to the comment policy. If you see a comment that violates the policy, please notify the Online staff.